The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Court of Appeal has ruled that bank customers whose transactions are delayed because of money laundering suspicions will have the right to challenge banks’ decisions.
The claim was brought against HSBC Private Bank by Jayesh Shah, who argued that he lost $300m (£191.65m) as a result of the bank’s refusal to transfer $28m to a Geneva account.
HSBC claimed it refused to carry out the request because it suspected Shah of being involved in money laundering. Consequently it was required by UK law to report Shah to the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca), which subsequently cleared the transaction.
Last January High Court judge Mr Justice Hamblen rejected Shah’s attempt to bring a claim against the bank, ruling that it had little chance of success. However, Lord Justices Ward, Longmore and Lloyd overturned the decision in a ruling that will allow Shah’s lawyers to attempt to prove that the bank was responsible for the claimant’s loss at a later date. Fountain Court’s Michael Brindle QC was instructed by Zaiwalla & Co to represent Shah.
Outer Temple Chambers’ Richard Lissack QC was instructed by DLA Piper for the defendant.