A&O slammed for "shocking" costs

  • Print
  • Comments (21)

Readers' comments (21)

  • You get what you pay for I guess

    I mean if I was a client such as RIM I think I would much prefer a £5m bill and victory in all the issues, than a £1m bill and having lost all of the issues.
    Of course remembering that 66% of RIM's costs will be paid by Visto meaning that the loser's bill is in reality a lot more than £1m - does that imply that he would have been okay if the A&O associates/staff had done 6 years of work in a 15 month period.
    Well done Taylor Wessing though. You've managed to lose the case outrightly yet make it seem like you've done your client a favour - if there's a lesson in any of this it's probably that.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (21)