The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A High Court judge has ordered Allen & Overy (A&O) and McDermott Will & Emery to estimate their costs before an intellectual property (IP) trial, showing judicial unease over the cost of UK litigation.
The firms will have to disclose how much they intend to bill clients BlackBerry manufacturer Research in Motion (RIM) and tech company Visto in an upcoming High Court dispute.
The dispute is related to a similar case that hit the courts in April 2008, where A&O had racked up £6m of fees for RIM compared with Taylor Wessing’s £1m bill for Visto.
In a costs judgment, Mr Justice Arnold cited Mr Justice Floyd’s damning judgment on A&O’s £6m fees in the previous dispute.
“As ;Floyd ;J observed, and I agree, that was a quite staggering disparity,” he said. “As he also observed, and again I agree, it’s astonishing that a sum of the order of £6m can have been spent by RIM in fighting those proceedings.”
Arnold J added that A&O’s costs in the previous cases showed that the traditional approach to costs control was “inadequate and unsatisfactory”.
To subscribe to our free Lawyer News Daily news and comment email, click here. Or get the latest news, features and comment as it's published with our free RSS feed.