The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A London firm battling the withdrawal of its Legal Aid Board (LAB) franchise has failed to retain its anonymity.
Three appeal judges, headed by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Woolf, have ruled that if Kaim Todner wants to pursue its challenge it must be identified.
The two-partner London firm was granted leave to challenge the LAB's decision in the High Court by Mr Justice Kay last june but he refused its application for anonymity.
Lord Woolf said last week that it was a general rule that parties and witnesses to legal proceedings had to "accept the embarrassment and damage to their reputation" when they became involved in litigation.
Edmund Lawson QC, for the firm, had argued that the profession should receive special treatment from the courts because of the duty it owed the courts and the importance of its reputation.
Woolf said: "It cannot be reasonable for the legal profession to seek preferential treatment... If the appellants had not raised the issue of anonymity... it is not likely that their proceedings would have resulted in any publicity, at least until the substantive hearing."