The Lawyer Africa Elite 2014 features an in-depth look at 46 leading independent firms’ strategies in 15 key sub-Saharan jurisdictions, as well as the views of in-house counsel from some of Africa’s largest companies... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
LAWYERS in Lancaster are celebrating a three-year stay of execution for an historic crown court threatened with closure.
A six-month campaign to keep the court open succeeded when the Lord Chancellor's Department agreed to review plans to transfer work from ancient Lancaster Castle to a new court complex at Preston.
Closure would have ended Lancaster's 800-year history as a centre of local justice. Assizes were first held there in 1166 and the town has played host to high-profile cases, including the trial of the six men accused of the IRA's Birmingham bombings in 1974.
But the history of the castle was itself part of the problem.
David Sykes, spokesman for the Lancaster, Morecambe and District Law Society, which led the campaign against closure, said: "The castle rooms, especially the shire hall, are splendid, but they certainly are not modern."
Closure was mooted as part of a Northern Circuit centralisation plan, partly because of the costs of using the castle, which the courts share with Lancaster prison.
The society claimed the move would make justice more remote, causing problems for jurors, witnesses, victims and defendants.
They argued that problems caused by the castle's age could be overcome and that ending the town's 800 years of legal history would affect Lancaster's prestige.
"The reprieve is great news for Lancaster," said Sykes. "The castle is a part of the business of the town, not a museum."