Wragges and Lawrence Graham prepare for £170m merger vote

  • Print
  • Comments (14)

Readers' comments (14)

  • It'll help LG if they then have a good intellectual property dept.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why on earth would Wragges want to saddle themselves with this? They have done so well over the last 10 years that they can surely do better than picking up a medioka firm on a downward trajectory.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can Wragges offload their London property and move into Lawrence Graham's then? That would appear to be the most sensible option. How much do Wragges have in London?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Law Hamster says: This is a very good deal. It solves fundamental and long term problems for both firms. The partners at either firm would be daft to reject it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Wragges has done well in the past 10 years but does seem to have lost its way of late. LG is in a downward spiral and needs rescuing - it's probably past the worst now that it has sub-let space in its offices. This could be a very canny move by Wragges at the right point in the LG life cycle - pick up a credible London practice on the cheap and build from there. Very interesting....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agree with 3.07, prestigious but under performing London practice picked up on the cheap will give Wragges the London exposure they need to propel them up the top 100 and give themselves more high profile work. One hopes some marketing wizzkid can come up with a better name than LG Wragges/Wragges LG/WLG/LGW. Also what mid-tier firm thinks it is a good idea to rent property at the height of the market in GBP70 per square foot office space.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Re Law Hamster, the same was said about the LG/FFW discussions but the Partners still rejected it without even going to a vote. And now LG have sublet the space that would have created the financial premium in that deal

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Anonymous 18 Nov 4:37 pm
    very true, you can lead a partnership to a strategic opportunity, but you can't make them think

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The potential tie up does make commercial sense. There is synergy between the firms practice areas and
    LG are coming out of the financial property gloom commitments whilst W&Co are on a work and financial resurgence.
    The joined up firm could leverage themselves into the UK Top 20ish within a few years.
    The question is, of course, if the partnerships can look beyond their own navels and overcome their fear.
    To do so would require open minds from the majority of the Partners of both firms and some foreward thinking and willingness to 'Make it so'...A little like the Crabtree & Poole era at Wragges in the 90's.
    Without such a willingness to grasp the opportunities and make a go of it, then both may well languish.
    I would trust that it becomes a 'Yes' and wish them well.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Makes a lot of sense. Both firms gain economies of scale. Both gain greater resources for international expansion. Wragges gains a scale presence in London it would struggle to build organically. LG gains a presence outside London becoming more balanced and also able to utilise Wragges lower cost base for some work.

    The fact that LG is not magic/silver circle does not mean this is not a good merger for both firms and is in fact irrelevant. The only thing to judge is whether this transaction creates a stronger firm. And it does.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (14)