The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Court of Appeal has overturned a landmark decision handed down by the High Court that had caused widespread concern regarding the priority of certain employment liabilities in administrations.
As first reported in The Lawyer (8 August), Mr Justice Peter Smith last month ruled in the case of Krasner v McMath that amounts due to employees in respect of protective awards and payments in lieu of notice take priority over the administrator's fees and administration costs.
However, Mr Justice Etherton overturned the Krasner decision last week during a first instance and expedited Court of Appeal hearing following an application by the administrators of Granville Technology, the company behind Time and Tidy computers.
The decision restores the previously understood position that protective awards do not attract priority, and alleviates concerns that Krasner could have jeopardised administrations involving companies forced to make large numbers of employees redundant.
Had the Krasner decision stood, administrators would have been more likely to terminate employment contracts within 14 days of a company being placed into administration to avoid becoming liable for the contracts and any subsequent protective awards, which would then take priority over preferential creditors.
Granville Technology called in administrator Grant Thornton at the end of July, resulting in the majority of the company's 1,600 employees at the group's Burnley factory being made redundant.
Had the Krasner decision stood, Grant Thornton would have probably made the company's remaining 165 employees redundant immediately.