www.thelawyer.com
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
Advanced search

Addleshaws to spearhead client billing revolution

Government funds project to bring pricing arrangements up to date

Chris Howe

Chris Howe

Addleshaw Goddard is looking to revolutionise the way it charges for legal services by partnering with Cranfield School of Management to carry out a Government-funded investigation into the future of pricing in the profession.

The 18-month project, which is funded by the ­Government’s Knowledge Transfer Partnership programme, is aimed at creating a blueprint for how partners bill clients. It is expected to result in the firm’s partners requiring training in how to assess the correct pricing framework for each job.

The move comes after Addleshaws earlier this year began the process of unbundling its chargeable work in a bid to free associates from routine assignments to develop their relationship-building skills (The Lawyer, 7 February).

As part of this the firm created a transaction services team in Manchester to handle commoditised work, allowing associates to focus on high-value client-facing work.
Addleshaws commercial director Chris Howe is leading the Cranfield project and will present the findings to the board in April 2012.

“What we want is to be able to go to the board and say, ’Here’s a mechanism that can help each partner come up with a pricing solution’,” said Howe. “It’s about sharing risks with the client. For example, we had one client that was growing fast, so we came up with a value arrangement whereby we billed a certain amount up front and the rest was based on the company hitting certain achievements.

“There’s a lot of frustration with current billing arrangements and the pace of change is exacerbated by price pressures, but we don’t think anyone’s cracked it yet.”

Howe added that the firm had looked at but rejected the contract lawyer model adopted by Berwin Leighton Paisner and being piloted by Eversheds, as it feels it would lead to lawyers becoming distanced from the firm.

Cranfield, meanwhile, is looking to publish what it believes will be the first academic report on law firm pricing at the end of the project.

“Issues involving pricing are acute in the legal sector, possibly because it’s been neglected for so long,” said Lynette Ryals, professor of strategic sales and account management at Cranfield. “I think there are a number of firms that need to wake up and smell the coffee.”

Addleshaws has previously worked with Cranfield with regard to its key account ­programme.

Readers' comments (6)

  • If it is government funded, the report is likely to reveal that we should all charge at legal aid rates and run up huge overdrafts and deficits - just like the government!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • If it is government funded then it will surely be freely available. And that will be gold dust for all marketing partners.

    Presumably the first lesson will be for firms to have flexibility in pricing: hourly billing should in future just be one of a portfolio of options for charging.

    Our research showed in each of the last two years how firms are rapidly embracing ever wider pricing options (exec sum free on our web site).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I have recently undertaken an exercise with a law practice to price up their NHS Litigation Authority service line using an Activity Based Costing approach - it was the fist time that the firm had ever priced on the basis of fully absorbed overheads, pricing at a net profit rather than contribution level. Plus, they had a menu of pricing options to suit theirs and their client's needs, without pricing and billing becoming a cottage industry in and of itself.

    That's the key message that has to come from any pricing exercise - firms must revolutionise how they bill without making it so complex that they erode the benefits.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Curious. If it's public funded then how did they pick Addleshaws as the law firm?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Re Anonymous 1/11/2011 12:16pm
    .....perhaps because the last time Cranfield worked with AG they developed contacts and understanding that could be leveraged to benefit this initiative?...perhaps because AG leads the way and have a reputation for doing so!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Quick! Give this week's Marketing Award to "Anonymous 1-Nov-2011 4:15pm"...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Follow The Lawyer on Twitter

My saved stories (Empty)

  • You have no saved stories

Save this article

The Lawyer Group is a division of Centaur Media plc

Centaur Media plc. Registered No 4948078 England. Registered Office 79 Wells Street, London W1T 3QN

Site powered by Webvision