News Careers Law firms Addleshaws applicants to be quizzed on social roots By The Lawyer 7 November 2010 00:00 17 December 2015 15:48 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Tim 8 November 2010 at 10:07 It is a good thing that attention is now being given to this issue. The results will be very interesting and I would be delighted if all top 20 firms undertook such an exercise and publised the results. Reply Link Anonymous 8 November 2010 at 11:19 A welcome development, but the danger lies in what is done with this data. Once you have the data, inevitably there will be calls to alter the criteria for offering candidates positions. It is all too easy to make simplistic assumptions about candidates based on answers to such questions. For example, I went to a public school, but could only do so because I had a scholarship and a bursary. There’s no way my parents could have paid the fees themselves. Fine to record that I went to a public school, but not to conclude (as some do) that my parents bought me privilege, or that I am part of some old school tie mafia. Reply Link Anonymous 8 November 2010 at 12:20 Of course it may be that firms want this information, so they can be sure that they are getting people from the right social background. Reply Link Peter 8 November 2010 at 13:20 Am I the only person to think “What bl***y business is it of yours?” Reply Link Thor 8 November 2010 at 16:19 Presumably next you’ll be asked to confirm household income and what newspaper your parents read. Reply Link Anonymous 8 November 2010 at 21:28 it strikes me that if they are merely trying to discover something about their ‘make-up’, then perhaps this is a question that should be asked after a decision is made regarding whether or not to offer the training contract/vacation scheme. I do not see that the firm should distinguish between students who had their parents pay for them to go to a public school and those who went on scholarship. The point presumably is that those who had access to the public school are more likely to achieve better academic results all else equal. This premise holds regardless of whether or not a person’s parents are able to pay the fees. Reply Link HereIAm 9 November 2010 at 09:59 As a female solicitor of African descent who went to a state school in inner London, I find my initial reaction to such initiatives being that of scepticism. I look forward to the day when firms do not require ‘Diversity Managers’ because staff are recruited based on their merits and not their sex, race, social background etc. Reply Link Anonymous 9 November 2010 at 12:08 ‘Of course it may be that firms want this information, so they can be sure that they are getting people from the right social background.’ So what is the right answer these days? ‘Am I the only person to think “What bl***y business is it of yours?” ‘ No. Reply Link Anonymous 9 November 2010 at 13:42 Are you Brits in competition with us Yanks to see who can come up with the silliest “diversity” initiatives? Reply Link Anonymous 11 November 2010 at 14:49 I think this is terrible and a complete turn in favour of the “social elite”. My family is poor, my father is a builder and my mother a house wife. I went to a very rough secondary schooI. Does that make anyone better o worse than me??? Reply Link Anonymous 16 November 2010 at 20:03 This is so that they can eliminate the undesirables. Applicants will now have to lie. Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.