- Employment (182)
- Litigation / Dispute Resolution (145)
- Company/Commercial (96)
- Banking / Finance (88)
- Regulatory and compliance (80)
- Financial services (69)
- Information Technology (41)
- Insurance/reinsurance (38)
- Corporate (34)
- Real Estate (25)
- Funds (23)
- Family (19)
- Pensions (18)
- Crime (16)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (14)
- Construction (11)
- Intellectual Property (11)
- Tax (11)
- Competition/EU (10)
- Healthcare (9)
- Insolvency & restructuring (8)
- Privacy and reputation (8)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (8)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (7)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (6)
- Telecoms (5)
- Business Tax (4)
- Energy (4)
- Human Rights (4)
- Immigration (4)
- In-House (4)
- Planning (4)
- Commodities (3)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (3)
- Environment (2)
- Other (2)
- Pharma/Biotech (2)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Personal Injury (1)
- Personal tax / Trusts (1)
- Private Equity (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
Marketing on social networks attracts the attention of the Advertising Standards Agency on a regular basis. This special bulletin considers the most recent adjudication, relating to Watch Daddy Cook.
Twenty-seven alternative energy projects were successful in technologies including advanced conversion, energy from waste, offshore wind, onshore wind and solar. Onshore wind seems to be the big winner...
Update on credit developments.
An analysis of the CMA’s recent Crossrail decision.
This month’s roundup of developments affecting banks, wealth managers, brokers and funds sees: the EU Commission and EIB launch a new advisory service on financial instruments and the Government response to the DECC consultation on new criminal offences for manipulating the energy market.
The decision in Plevin is of significant interest to financial institutions as it is the first opportunity the Supreme Court has had to consider the unfair relationship provisions in the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
The Commercial Court recently handed down another judgment in the long-running matter of Starlight Shipping Company v Allianz Marine and Aviation Versicherungs AG & Ors .
The EAT has ruled that an employee of a British company, who worked remotely in Australia for family reasons, was protected against unfair dismissal and whistleblowing detriment.
This article includes: Court fees to increase; Which country’s courts will hear your dispute? Brussels Regulation Recast; Pre-Jackson success fees and human rights; and more.
Social media usage continues to put employees’ jobs at risk.