- Employment (47)
- Company/Commercial (36)
- Corporate (10)
- Construction (9)
- Banking / Finance (8)
- Intellectual Property (8)
- Real Estate (8)
- Professional Indemnity/Negligence (6)
- Crime (5)
- Healthcare (5)
- Information Technology (5)
- Insolvency & restructuring (5)
- Regulatory and compliance (5)
- Competition/EU (3)
- Financial services (3)
- Insurance/reinsurance (3)
- Planning (3)
- Energy (2)
- Family (2)
- Funds (2)
- Media/Entertainment/Sport (2)
- Pharma/Biotech (2)
- PPP/PFI/Commercial projects (2)
- Transport (Including aviation and shipping) (2)
- Clinical/Medical Negligence (1)
- Commodities (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- In-House (1)
- Personal tax / Trusts (1)
- Private Equity (1)
- Public Sector/Local Authority (1)
Sort By: Newest first | Oldest first
Annabel Mackay, managing associate at Addleshaw Goddard, comments on the government’s response to its call for evidence on the whistleblowing framework.
Addleshaw Goddard has announced underlying fee income for the year ended 30 April 2014 of £172.5m, an increase of five per cent on the prior year.
It is common for commercial contracts to include clauses governing how notices of claims may be served and setting out a date by which they must be served after which they cannot be brought.
Six months after the confirmation by the Court of Appeal in Mitchell that the courts were to take very seriously the business of managing cases, some key lessons have emerged.
Addleshaw Goddard discusses four recent decisions regarding disclosure and privilege, including Rawlinson and another v Akers and another.
A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment — Clements v Lloyds Banking plc — highlighted the way in which age discriminatory remarks can result in protracted litigation.
The Unfair Dismissal (Variation of the Limit of Compensatory Award) Order 2013 has varied the limit on the compensatory award available in unfair dismissal claims.
The ECJ has held that where a worker is paid by way of basic salary and regular sales commission such commission must also be included in the calculation of holiday pay.
TUPE: service provision change occurred despite significant change in the way activities carried out post-transfer
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered the Employment Tribunal’s approach towards identifying whether there had been a service provision change.
The Supreme Court has allowed the appeal in Clyde & Co v Bates van Winkelhof, ruling that LLP members can be workers for the purposes of whistleblowing legislation.
Data & Information E-Alerts — 16 May 2014: protecting personal data; CESG cloud security guidance; and more
Addleshaw Goddard has released the 16 May 2014 issue of its Data & Information E-Alerts publication.
The Court of Appeal has closed the door to tenants that have successfully operated break clauses and wish to claim back rent paid for a period post the break date.
Addleshaw Goddard has retained its position as a core provider of legal services to FTSE 100 client Sainsbury’s.
When defending any claim, the key question that you will be asked from the business line is what is the financial exposure?
Can an ET insist expert medical evidence is provided about an alleged disability and the employer should bear the cost of obtaining it?
The EAT has overturned an tribunal’s decision that a claimant’s disability status could not be resolved without expert medical evidence being obtained.
ECJ confirms that commissioning mothers under surrogacy arrangements are not entitled to maternity leave
The ECJ has held that a woman who becomes a mother by way of a surrogacy arrangement does not have the right to maternity leave under the Pregnant Workers Directive.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has offered guidance on how employment tribunals should approach whistleblowing claims.
ACAS has published a brief guidance booklet entitled Early Conciliation Explained, which provides a basic introduction to the new system.
E.Surv claimed contribution under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 from Goldsmith Williams.
The Supreme Court in Coventry v Lawrence has altered the approach that courts will take when considering whether to grant injunctive relief or damages.