The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
THE LORD Chancellor is likely to receive two separate reports giving contrary advice on the rights of audience for employed solicitors, both from the same organisation.
The 17-member Lord Chancellor's Advisory Committee on Legal Education and Conduct (Aclec) has informed the Law Society that, by a "small majority" of nine to eight, it opposes the application and will inform Lord Mackay this week.
But the Law Society understands the minority group will also submit its own report supporting the society's position.
Aclec was unable to confirm the position last week, but indicated there could be an announcement this week.
Lord Steyn, Aclec chair, informed the Law Society in a letter on 15 May of Aclec's stance and added: "The committee does not believe that it would be appropriate to consider any new amendments to the application."
Law Society president Charles Elly, in an angry response on 18 May, said that the minority group would approve the society application subject to amendments which it has already proposed in December.
On this basis, Elly stressed that the society would supply Aclec with its amendments and would formally request Aclec, under Courts and Legal Services Act procedures, to consider them.
After notifying Aclec, the Law Society will have to make its amendments at the next council meeting which is scheduled for July.