ABI secures compensation victory as CoA reverses earlier ruling

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Readers' comments (1)

  • I am not sure how APIL feel that the Claimant will loose out. When the Jackson reforms come in the increase is intended to reflect the ammended structure of legal fees and the fact that Claimant's damages will be reduced to help cover them. Surely therefore any Claimant who commenced proceedings under the presesnt system and obtained a 10% uplift on their damages would be receiving an unjust enrichment?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (1)