The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) has welcomed a consultation paper which it says has made new efforts to tackle problems with access to rehabilitation by accident victims
Mark Harvey, secretary of Apil, said the consultation paper 'Getting Back to Work' issued recently by the Association of British Insurers (ABI) and the TUC was a step in the right direction in identifying key problems and getting injured people back into employment.
The consultation paper aims to promote discussion and debate on the subject of rehabilitation to the workplace to advance knowledge and interest in the subject and ultimately the introduction of a more effective system of rehabilitation. The ABI and TUC wish to see the UK operate a system whereby all those injured or off work due to illness, regardless of the cause, could benefit from a rehabilitation programme.
According to Apil, funding is a fundamental obstacle and spreading the cost of rehabilitation among a number of stakeholders rather than expecting one organisation to foot the bill may alleviate the problem. Harvey said: "It is unfair to place such a burden on one single body. It would be much more sensible for employers to pay for rehabilitation and then be able to recoup some of their costs from an insurer or Government grant."
He added: "The NHS recovers costs of certain treatments from insurers and we see no reason why employers should not be able to do the same for the costs of rehabilitation."
Other areas of concern raised by the Apil included the "insufficient independence" between insurers and rehabilitation providers and it called for greater awareness of rehabilitation in the workplace, with employers playing a key role in the process.