A question of costs By The Lawyer 27 May 2009 12:37 17 December 2015 15:01 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Scep Tick 30 May 2009 at 11:38 “But during the appeal Sumption told Weston that in order for that costs ruling to be upheld he would need to demonstrate that Leeds United was “a slippery organisation, not good for its costs”.” The same Leeds United under the same Ken Bates that, when it went into administration, stiffed St John’s Ambulance out of 99% of the amounts owed to it, and was then bought out of administration by said Ken Bates? How slippery does one have to be to satisfy Mr Sumption? Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.