www.thelawyer.com
Monday, 21 May 2012
Advanced search

5KBW silk calls Reggae Reggae sauce man 'barefaced liar' in breach of contract case

The barrister representing the claimants in a High Court case brought against Reggae Reggae sauce entrepreneur Levi Roots has branded him a “barefaced liar”.

Levi Roots

Levi Roots

5KBW Chambers’ Ian Glen QC made the statement about the Jamaican-born businessman in a £600,000 breach of confidence and breach of contract case being brought by Roots’ former best friend Tony Bailey and financial adviser Sylvester Williams.

Bailey claims that Roots stole the recipe for the sauce from him and cut him out of an agreement to launch the sauce together when he appeared on BBC television programme Dragon’s Den alone.

Appearing on the show in 2007, Roots allegedly claimed that the recipe was handed down by his grandmother. He secured a £50,000 investment and, since then, has gone on to make millions from the condiment he purported to be the taste of the Notting Hill Carnival for over a decade.

Roots ran a jerk chicken stall with Bailey at the annual celebration of West Indian culture for 15 years but denies having stolen the ‘secret formula’. He claims it originated from a basic recipe being used at Bailey’s Brixton-based Caribbean restaurant.

However, giving evidence, a mutual friend of the pair said that Roots was a salesman who had no idea how to make the sauce until Bailey showed him.

At the hearing Glen read aloud from a label on a bottle of Reggae Reggae sauce. “It says ’Our family in Jamaica have been blending home-made jerk sauce since way back, and for years it’s been the taste of London’s Notting Hill Carnival’. Is that true?,” he said.

Roots replied: “No, that’s not true. It’s a marketing ploy.”

Roots allegedly confessed to having concocted the story on Dragons’ Den as a way of promoting the product, but claims the stall was only successful because it was “a Levi Roots stall”.

He said his business agreement with Bailey had terminated before he went on the show and insisted that Bailey and Williams have no rights to the business.

Earlier this year, Roots published a business book giving practical advice on launching a successful business as well as 10 essential rules that Roots believes should underpin any entrepreneurial value.

Glen was instructed by Simons Muirhead & Burton lawyer Gordon Clough for Bailey and Williams.

11 South Square Chambers’ Mark Vanhegan was instructed to act for Roots by EMW partner Mark Rondel.

The case continues and a judgment is expected next Thursday (24 November).

Readers' comments (9)

  • Having followed Levi's rise to fame, something of rags to riches, I wonder why there hadn't been stringent checks by the investors (BBC dragons) prior to associating with him? TheLawMap

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely 'ragga to riches'....
    Either that barrister has some sauce making that statement or Levi is being a bit of a jerk.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely 'ragga to riches'....
    Either that barrister has some sauce making that statement or Levi is being a bit of a jerk.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sounds like Mr Glen was accusing the Defendant of having effected a Roots Manuva.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Tony Bailey (mmmm creamy),

    I feel your pain.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The Roots of the matter seems to be that they can Bailey stand each other

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • LawMap Associate, it seems the dragons made money from this business investment. Never allow a person's character get in the way of good bussiness.
    But seriously this case, on the reports so far, seem a pretty weighted in favour of the sauce man. What really does the freinds have???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How can a man be judged a liar and a fraud, but then still win the case. The claimants were saying the same thing as the judge. Oh, i forgot, money talks...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Levi won his case hands down, and was awarded indemnity cost. The judge said "This was a dishonest claim, dishonestly advanced". It seems that the "barefaced liar" accusation was just a bit of grandstanding for the headlines - as part of the strategy behind this "dishonest claim" (brought on an CFA). It didn't win the case though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Follow The Lawyer on Twitter

My saved stories (Empty)

  • You have no saved stories

Save this article

The Lawyer Group is a division of Centaur Media plc

Centaur Media plc. Registered No 4948078 England. Registered Office 79 Wells Street, London W1T 3QN

Site powered by Webvision