The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A trio of barristers from 20 Essex Street is seeking to overturn a 2006 Court of Appeal ruling in the battle over a $55m (£27.83m) share of revenue in the oilfields of Yemen.
The appeal judgment, led by Lord Justice Lawrence Collins, held that the court had the power to appoint a receiver by way of "equitable execution?over?future receipts from a defined asset".
Collins LJ continued: "There is no firm foundation in authority for a rule that the remedy is not available in relation to future debts."
This ruling was sparked from the ongoing dispute between?Palestinian billionaire businessman Munib Masri and two Lebanese companies - Consolidated Contractors International Company and Consolidated Contractors Oil and Gas (CCC).
Masri?claimed?CCC was in breach of a 1992 agreement by having failed to pay the billionaire 10 per cent of its share of the revenue of the Masila oil concession in the Yemen.
In July 2006 Mrs Justice Gloster held that CCC was liable and made post-judgment orders including receivership, which was subsequently appealed to, and dismissed by, the Court of Appeal.
The 20 Essex Street trio - Alexander Layton QC, Thomas Raphael and Ben Olbourne - was instructed by Olswang partner Jeremy Mash for CCC.
Masri's lead counsel, Simon Salzedo of Brick Court?Chambers,?was instructed by Simmons & Simmons partner Simon Morgan.