Co-operative Legal Services (CLS), Oxford-based John Welch and Stammers and Kent-based Lawbridge Solicitors have become the first alternative business structures (ABS) to be approved by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Eddie Ryan
CLS has long been vocal about its ambitions to convert to an ABS. The retail giant established CLS in 2006 with a view to converting when the legislation was enacted. It officially announced its application to the SRA in December (7 December 2012).
CLS managing director Eddie Ryan said: “This move is a natural extension to the range of professional services we currently provide within The Co-operative, which includes banking, pharmacy and Funeralcare.
“We’re committed to playing a leading role in this new era by offering straightforward value-for-money expert legal services, backed by an ethos of social responsibility.”
The company has been on a hiring spree in anticipation of the conversion, looking to fill 150 new positions across the business as it expanded into the legal services market (12 January 2012).
Also approved is two partner firm, John Welch and Stammers. The SRA said ABS status will enable the high street firm to continue and develop, as one solicitor partner retired in December 2011 leaving two solicitor partners at the firm. The conversion will allow Bernadette Summers, who has been practice manager for the past 12 years, to be appointed as a non-lawyer managing partner.
Family run firm Lawbridge Solicitors, which has also been approved, is home to
one fee-earner, Michael Pope. As an ABS his wife Alison Pope, currently the practice manager, will become a director of the firm with a significant shareholding.
SRA chief executive Antony Townsend said: “This represents a milestone we’ve been working towards for nearly two years.

Antony Townsend
“The arrival of ABS should foster a more flexible and innovative market for legal services. By stimulating competition and encouraging innovation, we should see consumers’ experiences enjoy a major boost.”
He continued: “”Some people may be surprised that there are two high street practices with a handful of staff among the first wave of ABS organisations that we’ve authorised. But we’ve always said that ABS offers options for all firms, not just large organisations.”
The regulator said around 60 stage two forms have been submitted so far after initial interest from nearly 180 applicants.
However, the legal watchdog had come in for criticism for failing to move quickly enough to get ABS applicants approved.
Insurance firm Parabis was been forced to delay its ABS deal with private equity house Duke Street because the SRA had not approved its application by the set deadline (19 March 2012).
One source commented: ““The issue is that we don’t have a proper timetable. There’s a six-month statutory timescale, but it only starts when they decide. Some people think it starts when you put the application, but that isn’t the case.”
Townsend, however, said: “We make no apology for ensuring that the systems we have in place are thorough and in some cases, time-consuming.”
Readers' comments (4)
James Watthey | 28-Mar-2012 10:38 am
You'd think the first Tescolawyers would at least be from, well, Tesco.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Neil | 28-Mar-2012 5:48 pm
The English version of Jacoby & Meyers. Caveat Emptor.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Nicola Matheson-Durrant, Family Law Clinic Ltd | 30-Mar-2012 11:02 am
It could be the worst public relations move of the century for large organisations to cannibalise firms of/individual Solicitors. This plan simply hasnt been thought through carefully or advised on properly. Do organisations like the Co-op believe for one moment that the Solicitors who work for them will be transformed and morphed into more honest, sincere individuals, who will have more integrity just because they work for them? One only has to see how many complaints there are each year about Solicitors, to realise the answer to that. The need to invest long term in an enormous complaints handling department will outweigh any short-term benefits on that issue alone.
How is the key problem of cost for services going to be dealt with when complaints are so serious that liability insurance costs of paying out on complaints affect the costs of, say, the Co-op's legal services.
What about alienating half of their existing client-base? If the Co-op are considering offering representation in litigation cases , divorce and children act advice and services, and start to represent one party against the other, it is logical that the 'losing' party and their family and friends will probably never want to shop in the Co-op or buy any of its services again. The risk of losing a significant section of its grocery-buying client base is so significant, that the Co-op and other large grocers should shelve their legal services plans or do an entire re-think very soon.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 30-Mar-2012 8:24 pm
Brilliant news for the Co-operative Legal Services, i think this is a great move forward for a well respected company and will create more jobs!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment