The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
White & Case has lost its long running battle with the US Department of Justice (DoJ) over the extradition of businessman Ian Norris.
The Supreme Court convened nine Supreme Justices to hear the case, which examined the validity of the UK extradition treaty with the US.
The court, chaired by Supreme Court president Lord Phillips, ruled unanimously that Norris, a retired chief executive of Morgan Crucible, should face charges related to obstruction of justice in the US. Norris won an earlier court battle against being extradited in relation to price-fixing charges (12 March 2008).
White & Case partner Alistair Graham instructed Brick Court Chambers’ Jonathan Sumption QC (pictured) to represent Norris.
The court rejected the argument that to extradite the 67-year-old would be an infringement of his human rights under Article 8 of the Human Rights Act - the right to family life in the UK, where his wife is based.
Lord Phillips ruled that Norris’s efforts to delay the extradition had exacerbated the consequences that his family would suffer.
The court ruled: “One has to consider the effect on the public interest in the prevention of crime if any defendant with family ties and dependencies such as those which bind Mr Norris and his wife was thereby rendered immune from being extradited to be tried for serious wrongdoing. The answer is that the public interest would be seriously damaged.
“It’s for this reason that only the gravest effects of interference with family life will be capable of rendering extradition disproportionate to the public interest that it serves.”
The DoJ directly instructed 6 Kings Bench Walk’s David Perry QC.
Civil rights group Liberty instructed Richard Hermer QC to act as an intervener in support of Norris.